Category Archives: State and General Issues

Peter Mac’s ghost floor

empty hospital bed

“Today the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre has opened with an empty 13th floor.

In 2011 the Coalition Government appointed Plenary Health to build the VCCC. An additional floor (the 13th) was negotiated within the total project budget to house Peter MacCallum Private.

One of Daniel Andrews’ first acts as Premier was to scrap the 42 bed Peter Mac Private, against the will of the Board of Peter Mac and with no explanation other than that the VCCC wasn’t to be for “greedy profit making”.

This decision has meant that Peter Mac cannot treat an additional 10,000 cancer patients per year, increase the number and range of clinical trials nor offer choice to the 38% of current Peter Mac patients who are private, freeing up public beds for the most needy.

Peter Mac is a much loved institution that saves lives and Daniel Andrews has put politics ahead of people with cancer.”


Victorian families are living in fear under Daniel Andrews


The release of the ABS’ victim of crime statistics shows that crime is out of control in Victoria under Daniel Andrews.

Under Daniel Andrews’ watch, in just one year armed robberies have gone up 14%. And robberies of people’s homes are up 44%.

Despite this shocking crime wave, Daniel Andrews has allowed police stations to close and the number of front line police at stations to be cut.

Shadow Minister for Police Ed O’Donohue visited the Point Cook Residents Association to hear first-hand the concerns of residents following several home invasions that have left them living in fear.

Victorians are too afraid to drive alone at night, arming themselves with cricket bats, and considering forming vigilante groups because there are not enough police to protect them.

Victorians have a right to feel safe in their homes and on our streets. Daniel Andrews’ cuts to police resources and a soft approach to justice are endangering families.

Back to Work closed for business

people working image

Labor’s failed ‘Back to Work’ scheme will be closed for business as of next Monday.

Under this secretive government, the closure announcement was nowhere to be found on the Premier’s website, but buried on the State Revenue Office website.

Despite promising to deliver 100,000 full-time jobs in Victoria within two years of coming to office, Daniel Andrews’ flagship jobs program has tanked.

On the Government’s own figures, fewer than 12,100 total positions have been supported.

After spending $40 million dollars of its pledged $100 million, the Back to Work scheme has closed its doors, leaving $60 million of unallocated funds.

Of the $40 million that has been spent, evidence has been provided to the Liberal Nationals Coalition that suggests serious rorting has occurred.

The Coalition has very real concerns about the eligibility and the accountability of these payments. We will be writing to the Auditor-General to seek a full investigation into where this money has gone and whether the scheme has met the probity standards Victorians should expect.

Under Daniel Andrews and his hapless Treasurer, Labor’s ‘Back to Work’ has proven to be a failure of public policy, a waste of public money and another broken promise to the people of Victoria.



Given that the $100 million scheme is “now fully subscribed but only $40 million has been spent on almost 16,000 payments, what has the final $60 million been spent on?


  • Given that organisations claiming Back to Work Scheme payments “are not required to provide evidence verifying your claim” how many payments made since the scheme began on 1 July 2015 have been audited?


  • Data shows the majority of payments have been paid to organisations employing apprentices and trainees.  Is this because “apprentices and trainees are eligible for payment straight away, and no period of ‘training’ or ‘work placement’ is required to receive the payment”?

Source: pg. 5

  • How many employees hired between 1 July 2015 and 31 December 2015 (the first six months of the Back to Work Scheme) remain in employment at those companies today?
  • Given the Andrews Government spent $711,553 in just one month (June 2015) to advertise the Back to Work Scheme, how much was spent on advertising in the 2015/16 financial year?Coalition media release



The Liberal Nationals Coalition welcomes the Government matching our commitment to introduce new offences of car-jacking and aggravated car-jacking with maximum jail terms of 15 and 25 years respectively.

However, we question why it has taken so long, after the Coalition has already introduced legislation.

It is yet another example of Daniel Andrews playing belated catch up on law and order and community safety.

Under Daniel Andrews total crime is up over 12% and car-jackings have increased by a staggering 80% while home invasions and gang violence have spiralled out of control.

Despite this, frontline police numbers have been cut and police stations have either been closed or had their opening hours cut, with the latest under threat being the new Forest Hill Police Station.

Renewal of Myki Contract


Myki Image_o

The Andrews Labor Government has decided to reward poor performance by awarding another $700 million contract to the makers of Myki.

Only Daniel Andrews thinks it’s reasonable to give the makers of Myki another chance despite years of incompetence and failure.

Daniel Andrews and Jacinta Allan need to explain to Victorians why they have doubled-down on Labor’s plagued Myki system without even considering alternative options such as London’s Oyster Card or Hong Kong’s Octopus systems.

The Liberal Nationals Coalition has referred the retendering process for Myki to the Auditor General and urges them to now expedite this review.

The retendering of the Myki contract was an opportunity to improve the system for Victorian public transport users through use of new technologies such as credit card tap-on, and use of smart phone devices.

Victorians will be the ones who suffer the consequences for Daniel Andrews and Jacinta Allan’s continued bungling of this opportunity.

New Financial Year, New Labor Taxes and Charges

As the new financial year starts today, Victorians have woken up to a string of higher taxes and charges to pay for Daniel Andrews’ wasteful spending.

Homebuyers face paying up to $2,234 more in fees when they purchase a home under massive increases to land transfer fees commencing today.

Under the changes, the previous fee cap set at properties valued at $500,000 has tripled to $1.5 million, meaning that purchasers will see transfer fees jump by up to 163 per cent.

These higher fees will see property buyers pay an extra $140 million to the Andrews Labor Government over four years.

Amongst other fee changes from 1 July:

  • The Fire Services Property Levy will increase by $46.1 million; a 7.3% increase;
  • The stamp duty surcharge payable on property purchased by international investors rises from 3% to 7%, flowing on to increased rents paid by Victorian tenants;
  • General government fees and charges have increased across the board by 2.5%; and
  • 28 day recreational fishing licences jump from $12 to $20.

Comments attributed to Shadow Treasurer Michael O’Brien

“Daniel Andrews’ wasteful spending means that Victorians are being hit hard by a raft of new taxes, fees and charges.

“While many Victorians are struggling to enter the housing market, Daniel Andrews is gouging home buyers with massive increases to land transfer fees.

“By ripping an extra $35 million a year out of the pockets of Victorian homebuyers, Labor is hurting housing affordability.

“Even fishing isn’t safe under Daniel Andrews, with recreational fishing fees rising by 66% from 1 July.

“As the saying goes, give a man a fish – he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish – he eats for a lifetime. Tax a man to fish – you must be Daniel Andrews.”


FWC sidelined experienced commissioner for fireys’ case


The Fair Work Commission has defended its decision to sideline a commissioner who usually hears cases involving firefighters and ­allocate the dispute between Victoria’s Country Fire Authority and the firefighters union to a former left-wing unionist, who is ­accused of bias.

The handling of the case by ­Julius Roe, former national president of the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union, infuriated the CFA’s now-disbanded board and chief executive Lucinda Nolan, who quit after refusing to accept his ­recommendations.

CFA volunteers fear the recommendations give the United Firefighters Union of Australia an effective veto over operational ­decisions.

Responding to questions from The Australian to commission president Iain Ross, an FWC spokeswoman confirmed Nick Wilson, an industrial centrist who since being appointed commissioner in 2013 has issued dozens of decisions and orders relating to disputes involving the UFUA, was not allocated the case, in preference for Mr Roe.

Industrial cases are allocated by a “panel system’’ in which ­commissioners are attached to ­industry-specific panels. When the CFA application was lodged last October, Mr Wilson was the only Melbourne-based member of the government services panel that covers firefighting services with extensive experience in firefighter cases, the FWC confirmed.

The CFA, having failed to reach agreement with the union following protracted negoti­ations, applied for the FWC to ­appoint a commissioner to oversee a conciliated resolution to the dispute. Instead of calling on Mr Wilson, the head of the government services panel, FWC vice-president Joseph Catanzariti went outside his own panel and referred the dispute to Mr Roe.

Mr Roe is a member of the services and mining panel that looks after disputes across a wide range of industries, but not firefighting. He has extensive previous experience in firefighters’ cases between July 2010 — shortly after he was appointed by then workplace relations minister Julia Gillard — until late 2013.

Pressed to explain its case allocation, the FWC said: “In contentious matters it is generally appropriate to have conciliation and arbitration proceedings conducted by different members. The CFA matters were referred to Commissioner Roe for conciliation as he had extensive experience in dealing with Victorian fire services matters and the allocation of the matters to Commissioner Roe would leave Commissioner Wilson available to deal with any arbitral appli­cations made in relation to the dispute. No party objected to Commissioner Roe dealing with the … application.’’

Despite CFA anger at the outcome of the conciliation overseen by Mr Roe, there appears no prospect of an arbitral application.

UFU Victoria secretary Peter Marshall and Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews have backed the recommendations and the government dumped the CFA board after it made its opposition clear.

Mr Andrews’s insistence that the CFA accept Mr Roe’s recommendations prompted former emergency services minister Jane Garrett to resign from cabinet.

Opposition Leader Matthew Guy publicly accused Mr Roe of bias and said his recommen­dations could have been written by the UFU. Mr Roe had defended his fairness and independence.

Within industrial relations circles, there is growing consternation about perceived political interference in the workings of the FWC and the decision to sideline Mr Wilson, a Harvard-­educated former Fair Work ombudsman. Malcolm Turnbull has promised to legislate to protect volunteer organisations if his government is re-elected. Within the CFA, there is a push to establish an independent inquiry into how the entire case was handled.




MONDAY 20 JUNE 2016, 9.08am

Issues: CFA board sacking, EBA, union influence


In simple terms, tell me why you didn’t want to sign the EBA


Well basically Neil there’s been a long process as we all know trying to get this EBA signed off but our view was the EBA was unsatisfactory document, there were many clauses in there that were unsatisfactory to us and we didn’t believe that we would be acting in the best interests of CFA, which is our first responsibility as board members, we are an independent board and when we look at the document there’s no way we could sign that document.


Why? What does it do overall to the CFA?


First thing Neil, we were very keen not to have veto type clauses in our EBA.

The CFA is a very different organisation to the MFB in that we have a mixed workforce of volunteers and career firefighters and therefore to put in veto changes the whole nature of CFA.

The Act says that we’re a volunteer based fire & emergency services organisation and with the way veto could be used that wouldn’t be the case going forward and we think that fundamentally changes CFA to a very detrimental affect to the state.


Did it mean, as has been speculated upon, that effectively the UFU would be running the CFA?


It would mean that management could made decisions that could be overturned or disagreed with and we’d be down at Fair Work.

We felt we would be living at Fair Work, our senior management would be there every day pretty well, trying to deal with the many veto clauses that are there.

Because it gives the UFU the opportunity to say no we don’t agree with management, we want that changed.


So you actually would be losing control of the organisation


Oh very much so. Very much so.


And who would be controlling it?


Well it, it would become a very frustrating process and that’s one of our concerns, already we’ve spent a lot of time in recent years at Fair Work trying to sort out very minor disputes and there wasn’t, there were clauses that were similar to veto but not full veto as per the agreement that’s now been put forward and it really would be very, very difficult for management to actually be in control and certainly for our two current, well Lucinda’s no longer current, but for Lucinda and Joe Buffone, particularly Joe Buffone, he would lose control of the resources which is the firefighting complement which is both career and a lesser extent volunteers, but there’s clauses in there that change the very nature of we are CFA, we are one CFA.


Is it correct there were 50 clauses with power of veto?


Yes, there were about 50 clauses of power of veto, yes.



Do you think that, the bottom line in the CFA is we want it to do the good job it’s done.




In protecting people and fighting fires.

Did what was happening with the EBA, possibility of undermining firefighting capability?


I think there are some concerns over the clauses around 7 on the fire ground for example.

Now there’s a little bit of misunderstanding, this really only applies in areas where there are the integrated stations but currently there isn’t a distinguishing way of thinking of an incident controller.

It could be a career firefighter if they’re there first. If it was a volunteer brigade gets there and they set up the incident control then the volunteer would be the incident controller.

Well we’re getting to the stage where the EBA really says, no, career firefighters only report to career firefighters. They don’t report to volunteers.

If a volunteer is running an incident and the career people arrive then the volunteer would have to hand over to the career firefighter.


Well that sounds potentially dangerous.


It is potentially dangerous and certainly not the way that, I mean the career firefighters do a fantastic job, they are well trained but so are the volunteers and we have incident controllers within our volunteer ranks who are very experienced in particularly in some of the areas where, we’re not talking about structured fires here, we’re more talking about bushfires and things like that.

You really want the first people there to take control and get on with the job. And that may be a volunteer brigade, even in an area where there isn’t integrated station. Now, we think there are safety issues around that that are important.


And the integrated stations are spreading aren’t they?


There will be more integrated stations, I mean we don’t hide from the fact that as you know we have 342 new firefighters out of the Bush Fire Royal Commission, that was a recommendation from the Commission and now we have another 350 firefighters being added.

Most of those firefighters will be station staff. So we will have more integrated stations and we’ll need that Neil.

The peri-urban area of Melbourne and bigger cities and towns around Victoria do need integrated stations, there are big issues for CFA going forward, we’re well aware of that.


What about cost? I mean there’s been widely varying estimates of what this EBA will cost the CFA, will cost the tax payer if you like, what do you think?<span “=””>


Well I challenged our management on the numbers because the numbers are varied between $140m and $1.2b and the figure that I’ve been given by our Chiefs at the CFA has been about $6 to700m.

One of the things with the integrated model is that it is quite a high cost model simply because it’s not just the cost of firefighters of course we have to build a new station, new stations have to have accommodation and as you know as soon as you start putting in accommodation and bathrooms and so on the whole cost goes up considerably and there’s a lot of hidden cost in the CFA that isn’t seen as part of base budget [?]

So the CFA is already struggling to manage its budget because of things like overtime and so on that are simply what happens when you have a lot more career firefighters, but Neil we will need them going forward.

All the CFA is asking is to make sure that we are properly funded for them when they come along.


So the government estimates $147m, your estimates were $6 to 700m.


Correct. Yes.


mmm. OK. And there are others saying over billion.

The other thing that puzzled me is, there was an injunction which prevented you from signing the EBA right?




Were you in fact sacked for not signing the EBA?




Because if you were its contempt of court, surely?


Well, let’s put a lawyers to really sort out.

We.. the action all happened Friday a week ago, of course we were aware that, we had been working quite significantly, there had been attempts made both with Fair Work and also within Government to get us to a point where we would agree to sign the agreement that week.

We report to a Minister as a board.

There had been discussion with Minister Garrett and Minister Garrett certainly wasn’t prepared, had not changed her view on really asking us to sign the agreement and then when Minister Garrett resigned, with no real changes to the EBA.

That was our problem, nothing was changing, all the clauses were there, the words that Commissioner Roe gave us in that negotiation down at Fair Work, which was, they were always going to be non-binding recommendations, that was simply an attempt to move the thing forward.

But the contentious clauses weren’t being removed from the EBA and so at the end of the day, we had legal advice saying some of the clauses are just straight out of legal.

We’d already had some work done by the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission and they were very concerned with fire emergency services as far as meeting the requirements of initial [?]employment standards, and so nothing was changing Neil.

So how could we, to do that would be backing down. We would lose our integrity as a board if we had changed that, I mean obviously the volunteer association was very concerned about the impact on volunteers, and they were talking regularly with us, so we were being asked to sign basically a document that had been around for about a month and a bit but they’d been nothing withdrawn from it.


But were you sacked because you wouldn’t sign it?


Definitely. Yes. Yes.


But you’ve got a court injunction saying you can’t sign it?


There is a court injunction, that’s right taken out against CFA by the VFBV to say that we couldn’t sign the document, we had to have further negotiation with the volunteers.


The new board can’t sign it either then, can they?


Well that injunction, believe it or not, runs out on Wednesday so




Well Neil, the one thing I’d say, and it’s not for me to comment on the new board, that’s the Government’s business.

But at the moment we have 5 board members of a board of 9, the 4 that are not there are the volunteer association members.

And I would hope that the agreement doesn’t get signed before the board has it’s volunteer association members because I think that would be very, very poor form for the Government to actually push it through when there are no volunteers on the board when the Act specifically says the board will comprise 9 people of which 4 will be volunteers.


Lucinda Nolan, a good Chief Executive?


Excellent Chief Executive.


Jane Garrett a good Minister?


Very, very impressive Minister. Learnt so much without and about, highly respected by certainly by a lot of people in the CFA.

Both of those people have spent a lot of time in the field meeting with firefighters whether they be career or volunteer, visiting stations, attending events.


Do you know what’s happened here, does Daniel Andrews not understand the culture of the CFA?


I think we probably have an ideology issue Neil.

That’s how I’d describe it. I think we’ve got ideology versus governance taking place here and at this stage ideology is winning.

The CFA is a very complex organisation because of the natures you’ve already heard.

There are other unions involved with CFA as well. And within the EBA there’s an attempt to get firefighters into roles that are currently not firefighter roles, they’re actually roles that are filled by people from other unions for example, our peer support people, our volunteer support officers and brigade administrator support officers.

So Mr Andrews clearly is aligned with the unions, we know that, we don’t hide from that. Mr Andrews is quite public about that.

But the CFA is a much more complex organisation, we have 800, around 800 firefighters, career firefighters and 60,000 volunteers.

Therefore as a board, we just can’t roll on this one.


What’s the future of the CFA?

Now you’re gone, Lucinda gone, the Minister gone, the EBA will be signed it would seem. What happens?


Well the CFA is essential for Victoria. It’s a very important part of the safety of Victoria and I think it has to be worked out.

I think over time Neil, as it happened in many other areas, we just have to reduce the role of the union in this and that’s different to our career firefighters because I’ve already said there will be more career firefighters going forward but I think the union has to have some of its power withdrawn so that we can, the CFA can get on and function.

It’s really important


But what if that doesn’t happen. At this stage it’s not going too. What’s the effect that has on the CFA?


Well morale is down. And when moral is down you’ve got problems, even in the field.

I mean one thing that has not really been evident, in the field, our firefighters fight together and they do it extremely effectively, but my fear is that this can actually lead to class wars if you like within the CFA and that would not be helpful and it would put peoples’ lives in danger, including firefighters themselves.


People’s lives in danger?


Well simply, if people are not cooperating.

I mean there are incidents that have happened in Victoria and they’ve been inquiries into what happened between say the CFA and DEPI for example, in the old days in one of those alpine fires.

So we do need all of the agencies working together and that’s the role Craig Lapsley plays as Emergency Management Commissioner, to bring that together and that for Craig, inter-operability, is absolutely key to the future.


Would it be fair to say that you’re nervous about the future?


Well I’m certainly nervous, simply because I think that we in the last 6 months, since Lucinda and Joe went into those roles, we’ve been working on a brand new strategic plan, we’ve started to really focus a lot longer term into the future and I’d hate to see that work get lost because I think it’s essential that the CFA gets more flexibility into it, we’ll need different models.

At the moment the career model is a bit of a one-size fits all, but we have no part-time work, we don’t have day shifts generally, everyone works within 14 shift other than the [inaudible] senior officials of course and there are a lot of inequities in CFA.

There’s a lot of work to be done in this organisation to get it fit for purpose for the future and I hope that we don’t now lose some of that great works that’s been done because that would be shame for Victoria.


Yeah but you’re worried we will because the union is in control?


Well, I worry that we will, but also, we’ve lost some time as well. We’ll lose time.

I mean when a new board comes in they’ve got to really pick up pretty quickly, obviously, we haven’t had a proper handover or changeover, they just come in and they are now the board and they’re going to have to pick it up.

Lucinda’s not there. And it’s a big job for Joe at the moment he’s got Chief Executive Officer and Chief Officer responsibilities so it’s a tough time for CFA.


Dan’s tinkering with EBA deal fixes nothing

The measures the government has announced today on the CFA dispute amount to little more than politely asking Peter Marshall and the UFU to be nice once they’ve been given all the powers over the CFA that they’ve demanded.

The only change the government claim will be made to the EBA itself is “inserting clauses into the Agreement that clearly specify that the role of volunteers and the services they provide are not altered by the Agreement”.

However, those clauses will have no effect on the UFU’s powers of control over the CFA, because nothing in an EBA can alter the “role” of a volunteer in the first place.   Instead, what the EBA will do is restrict how the volunteers can perform their role and what the CFA can do to support them, and the government’s clauses will provide no protection against that.

All the other “fixes” announced today are outside of the EBA – either “a statement of joint intent” or a “commitment from the parties”.

However, a “statement of joint intent” or “commitment” has no legal force when up against with the terms of an EBA.  As Daniel Andrews would say, “it’s not worth the paper it’s written on”.

Once the EBA has been signed and approved by the Fair Work Commission, there’s nothing anybody will be able to do about it if Peter Marshall and the UFU ignore or breach their “statements of intent” or “commitment”.

In other words, the measures as outlined in the media release will have zero effect on “the enforceability of key aspects of the Agreement”.

To make matters worse, the commitment the government says it will seek from “the parties” that “agreement will not be unreasonably withheld” on matters which require consultation in fact is an admission that the so-called “consultation clause” amounts to a veto.

If “consultation” does not amount to a veto, why is Premier Andrews now asking that agreement cannot be unreasonably withheld?  And since the media release says this is nothing more than a “commitment” outside of the EBA, there’s nothing that can be done about it even if the UFU does unreasonably withhold agreement.

Furthermore, today’s announcement confirms that Emergency Services Commissioner, Craig Lapsley, has been left powerless other than to plead with Peter Marshall for cooperation and to tell the world through six and 12 month reports what’s happened or not happened about implementation of the Agreement.

In short, nothing in today’s announcement alters Daniel Andrews’ disgraceful sell-out of the CFA, its 60,000 volunteers and communities across Victoria into the hands of the UFU.